Interstellar CNO Isotope Ratios
Interstellar CNO Isotope Ratios

-
C. Henkel
-
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie
- Auf dem Hügel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
-
T.L. Wilson
-
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie
- Auf dem Hügel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
-
N. Langer
-
Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik
- Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85740 Garching, Germany
-
Y.-N. Chin
-
Radioastronomisches Institut der Universität Bonn
- Auf dem Hügel 71, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
-
R. Mauersberger
-
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie
- Auf dem Hügel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
Paper appeared in The Structure and Content of Molecular Clouds (25
years of Molecular Radioastronomy) eds. T.L. Wilson and K.J. Johnston :
a proceeding of a conference held at Schloß Ringberg, Tegenasee, Germany
on April 14 - 16, 1993, pp. 72-88.
If you want to have a look at the complete paper (without figures) please click
here (PostScript file of 153238 bytes).
Abstract.
In an interpretation of interstellar, circumstellar, and solar system CNO
isotope ratios, we find two scenarios which are free of internal
inconsistencies. The first requires that the early solar system was enriched
by material from massive stars, leading to enhanced
12C/13C and 18O/17O ratios and to a
reduced 14N/15N ratio. The second involves infall of gas
onto the galactic disk after the formation of the solar system. Both scenarios
require that the bulk of the interstellar 16O, 18O, and
15N originates from massive stars (> 8 solar mass), with
18O and perhaps 15N being destroyed in lower mass stars.
17O is mainly synthesized in stars of intermediate mass while
12C, 13C, and 14N are produced in stars of
high and intermediate masses. With respect to nucleosynthesis, evolutionary
models of massive stars applying the Ledoux criterion for convection and
semiconvective mixing should be preferred. These yield high 18O
abundances above the convective He-burning core. For 17O,
theoretical yields and observational data are not consistent, since models
predict too much 17O from massive stars. The absence of an
18O/17O gradient in the galactic plane remains
unexplained. Since 18O and 17O are products of quite
different processes, this absence strongly constrains numerical models of the
`chemical' evolution of the Galaxy.

Any suggestion or comments please
e-mail to einmann@asiaa.sinica.edu.tw.
Other Papers