Interstellar CNO Isotope Ratios
Interstellar CNO Isotope Ratios

C. Henkel
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie
Auf dem Hügel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
T.L. Wilson
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie
Auf dem Hügel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
N. Langer
Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik
Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85740 Garching, Germany
Y.-N. Chin
Radioastronomisches Institut der Universität Bonn
Auf dem Hügel 71, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
R. Mauersberger
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie
Auf dem Hügel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany

Paper appeared in The Structure and Content of Molecular Clouds (25 years of Molecular Radioastronomy) eds. T.L. Wilson and K.J. Johnston : a proceeding of a conference held at Schloß Ringberg, Tegenasee, Germany on April 14 - 16, 1993, pp. 72-88. If you want to have a look at the complete paper (without figures) please click here (PostScript file of 153238 bytes).
Abstract. In an interpretation of interstellar, circumstellar, and solar system CNO isotope ratios, we find two scenarios which are free of internal inconsistencies. The first requires that the early solar system was enriched by material from massive stars, leading to enhanced 12C/13C and 18O/17O ratios and to a reduced 14N/15N ratio. The second involves infall of gas onto the galactic disk after the formation of the solar system. Both scenarios require that the bulk of the interstellar 16O, 18O, and 15N originates from massive stars (> 8 solar mass), with 18O and perhaps 15N being destroyed in lower mass stars. 17O is mainly synthesized in stars of intermediate mass while 12C, 13C, and 14N are produced in stars of high and intermediate masses. With respect to nucleosynthesis, evolutionary models of massive stars applying the Ledoux criterion for convection and semiconvective mixing should be preferred. These yield high 18O abundances above the convective He-burning core. For 17O, theoretical yields and observational data are not consistent, since models predict too much 17O from massive stars. The absence of an 18O/17O gradient in the galactic plane remains unexplained. Since 18O and 17O are products of quite different processes, this absence strongly constrains numerical models of the `chemical' evolution of the Galaxy.

Any suggestion or comments please e-mail to einmann@asiaa.sinica.edu.tw.

Other Papers