淡江大學 一○○學 年度第一學期課程教學計畫表
壹、科目名稱:國際暨區域研究方法
貳、授課老師:林欽明 [研究室:驚聲大樓T1111;電話:2621-5656轉2796;傳真:2620-9904;E-mail: 113922@mail.tku.edu.tw;教學平台 http://tsp.ec.tku.edu.tw/113922qp;
Office hours:]
參、開課系所班級:亞洲所東南亞研究組
肆、必選修:選修
伍、學分數:2
陸、先修科目:無
柒、教學目標與範圍::
本課程是針對國際以及區域研究所應具備之研究方法做一概括性的引介。課程大別為兩部分,第一部份針對與國際以及區域研究較相關的研究領域以及方法做一解析,第二部分則就研究論文的寫作做一實作的探討。
捌、課程綱要:
第一週
導論
蔡今中。2010。〈對於社會科學研究這一領域應有的認知〉。《社會科學研究與論文寫作:成功發表秘笈》,三版(臺北市:高等教育文化事業公司),第一章,1-32。501.2
/8466 99 (TKU)
第二週 區域研究vs.學門
指定閱讀:
Kuijper, Hans. 2008.
"Area Studies versus Disciplines: Towards an Interdisciplinary, Systemic
Country Approach." The International
Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 3(7), 205-216 (http://www.asvj91.dsl.pipex.com/Hans_KUIJPER/AREA_STUDIES_Vs_DISCIPLINES_Hans_KUIJPER.pdf).
Canning, John. 2004. "Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning
in Area Studies." Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area
Studies (http://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/paper/2134).
建議閱讀:
黃國宬、江雪秋。2008。〈區域研究在全球化時代的定位〉。《黃埔學報》,期54,147-54 (http://www2.cma.edu.tw/u_edu/introduction/journal/54files/%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%B8%E9%A1%9E/54-S10.pdf).
林超琦。2009。〈美國日本研究的形成與發展〉。《台灣國際研究季刊》,5(3),秋季,73-94 (http://www.tisanet.org/quarterly/5_3_4.pdf).
Acharya, Amitav. 2008. "The Emerging Regional Architecture of
World Politics." World
Politics, 59(4), July, 629-52.
Bates, Robert H. 1997. "Area Studies
and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy?" PS: Political Science & Politics, 30(2), June,
166-69.
Canning, John (2005). "Disciplinarity:
A Barrier to Quality Assurance? The UK
Experience of Area Studies.” Quality
in Higher Education, 11(1), April, 37-46 (讀pp. 37-39).
Guyer, Jane I. 2004.
"Anthropology in Area Studies." Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 499-523.
Hanson, Stephen. 2008. "The
Contribution of Area Studies." Qualitative & Mixed Method Research, 6(2), Fall,
35-43 (http://www.giga-hamburg.de/dl/download.php?d=/content/forumregional/pdf/Hansen-Contribution_of%20Area_Studies.pdf).
Katzenstein, Peter J. 2001. "Area Studies and Regional Studies in the United States." PS: Political Science and Politics, 34(4), 789-91.
Morris, John T. 1998. "Introducing Master's Students to Area
Studies: An Interdisciplinary Research and Skills." PS: Political Science and Politics, 31(2), June, 204-208 (http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/420251.pdf).
Pepinsky, Thomas B., Barbara Geddes, Duncan McCargo, Richard Robison, Erik Martinez Kuhonta,
Dan Slater, Tuong Vu. 2010. "Roundtable Discussion of Erik Martinez Kuhonta,
Dan Slater, and Tuong Vu's
Southeast Asia in Political Science: Theory, Region, and Qualitative
Analysis." Journal of East Asian Studies, 10(2), May-August, 171-208.
Pierson, Paul (2003), “From Area Studies to Contextualized Comparison,”
in Grzegorz Ekiert and
Stephen E. Hanson, eds., Capitalism and Democracy in
Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule (New York: Cambridge University Press), 353-76. JN 96.A58C36
2003 (TKU)
QAA (Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education). 2008. "Area
Studies." Subject benchmark statements, Quality Assurance Agency for
Higher Education (http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/areastudies08.pdf).
Wikipedia. "Area Studies." Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_studies).
Wikipedia. "Cultural Studies." Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_studies).
Wikipedia. "East Asian Studies." Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Asian_studies).
第三週 研究設計
指定閱讀:
蔡今中。2010。〈如何尋找有創意、又有意義的題目〉。《社會科學研究與論文寫作:成功發表秘笈》,三版(臺北市:高等教育文化事業公司),Chap. 3, 57-63。501.2
/8466 99 (TKU)
龐奇 (Punch, Keith
F.); 張可婷譯。2009。〈建構研究計劃的一般性架構〉。《做出有效的研究論文與計劃》(臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司),第三章,27-42 (參考書目)。501.2
/835 (TKU)
建議閱讀:
伊殷 (Yin, Robert K.); 周海濤、李永賢、張蘅譯。2009。〈個案研究方案的設計〉。《個案研究:設計與方法》(臺北市:五南圖書出版公司),第二章,29-87 (References)。501.21
/889 3rd ed. (TKU)
貝利(Ralph Berry)著;李美馨譯。2003。〈主題的選擇:圖書館的使用/網際網路〉。《最新研究論文寫作指導》(臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司),第一、二章,6-27。811.4
/847 (TKU)。
龐奇 (Punch, Keith F.); 張可婷譯。2009。〈研究計劃:閱眾、期待與功能〉。《做出有效的研究論文與計劃》(臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司),第二章,13-26 (參考書目)。501.2 /835 (TKU)
Deaton,
Angus S. 2009. "Instruments of Development: Randomization in the Tropics,
and the Search for the Elusive Keys to Economic Development." NBER Working
Paper No. 14690 (http://www.nber.org/papers/w14690).
UNC. "Brainstorming." UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/brainstorming.html).
UNC. "Thesis Statements." UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/thesis.html).
UNC. “Dissertations.” UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/dissertation.html).
UNC. “Scientific Reports.” UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/lab_report_complete.html).
第四週 整理文獻
指定閱讀:
龐奇 (Punch, Keith
F.); 張可婷譯。2009。〈理論的角色與文獻的處理〉。《做出有效的研究論文與計劃》(臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司),第四章,43-63 (參考書目)。501.2
/835 (TKU)
貝利(Ralph Berry)著;李美馨譯。2003。〈研擬參考書目〉。《最新研究論文寫作指導》(臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司),第三章,29-44。811.4 /847 (TKU)。
建議閱讀:
瑞德里 (Ridley, Diana); 張可婷譯。2011。《一步步教您做文獻回顧》。臺北縣永和市 : 韋伯文化國際出版公司。811.4
/8555 (TKU)
UNC. “Annotated Bibliographies.” UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/annotated_bibliographies.html).
UNC. “Literature Reviews.” UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/literature_review.html).
第五週 蒐集資料
指定閱讀:
伊殷 (Yin, Robert K.);
周海濤、李永賢、張蘅譯。2009。〈實施個案研究:蒐集資料的準備〉。《個案研究:設計與方法》第三章,89-127。臺北市:五南圖書出版公司(References)。501.21
/889 3rd ed. (TKU)
伊殷 (Yin, Robert K.);
周海濤、李永賢、張蘅譯。2009。〈實施個案研究:蒐集資料〉。《個案研究:設計與方法》第四章,129-64。臺北市:五南圖書出版公司(References)。501.21
/889 3rd ed. (TKU)
建議閱讀:
貝利(Ralph Berry)著;李美馨譯。2003。〈做筆記〉。《最新研究論文寫作指導》(臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司),第四章,45-51。811.4
/847 (TKU)
Andorka, Rudolf. 1999. “The Use of Time Series in International Comparison.” Chap. 12 in Else Øyen, ed., Comparative Methodology: Theory and Practice in International Social Research (London: Sage), 203-23. HM 48.C635 1990 (TKU)
Ember, Carol L. 1986. “The
Quality and Quantity of Data for Cross-Cultural Studies.” Behavior Science Research, 20, 1-16;
reprinted in Alan Sica, ed., Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume II (London: Sage
Publications, 2006), 130-43. H 61.C5245 2006
(TKU)
Hudson, Michael C. 1973. “Data
Problems in Quantitative Comparative Analysis.” Comparative Politics, 5(1), 611-29; reprinted in Alan Sica, ed., Comparative
Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume II (London: Sage Publications,
2006), 144-61. H 61.C5245 2006 (TKU)
Turner, Joan. 2002. “Making
the Most of Making Notes.” In How to
Study: A Short Introduction (Thousand Oaks: SAGE), 54-59. LB 2395.T845 2002 (TKU)
UNC. "Reading To Write." UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/readingwriting.html).
UNC. “Statistics.” UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/statistics.html).
UNC. “Quotations.” UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/quotations.html).
Van Meter, Karl M. 1999. “Sampling and Cross-classification Analysis in International Social Research.” Chap. 10 in Else Øyen, ed., Comparative Methodology: Theory and Practice in International Social Research (London: Sage), 172-86. HM 48.C635 1990 (TKU)
第六週 區域研究方法概述
指定閱讀:
龐奇 (Punch, Keith
F.); 張可婷譯。2009。〈研究方法〉。《做出有效的研究論文與計劃》(臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司),第五章,65-85 (參考書目)。501.2
/835 (TKU)
Munroe, Robert L. and Ruth H. Munroe. 1991. “Comparative
Field Studies: Methodological Issues and Future Possibilities.” Behavior Science Research, 25(1-4),
155-85; reprinted in Alan Sica, ed., Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume II (London: Sage
Publications, 2006), 186-218. H 61.C5245 2006
(TKU)
建議閱讀:
威廉斯(Malcolm Williams)著 ; 王盈智譯。2005。〈詮釋性研究方法〉。《研究方法的第一本書》(臺北縣 : 韋伯文化國際出版公司),第三章,65-95 (Bibliography)。501.2
/8365 (TKU)
Alizi Alias. 2005. "Social Science Research Methods and Statistics from an Islamic Perspective." Paper presented at the International Conference of Quantitative Sciences and Its Application, 6-8 December, organised by Faculty of Quantitative Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia at Gurney Hotel and Residences, Penang, Malaysia (http://iium.academia.edu/AliziAlias/Papers/99173/Social_Science_Research_Methods_and_Statistics_from_an_Islamic_Perspective).
Basedau, Matthias and
Patrick Köllner. 2007. "Area
Studies, Comparative Area Studies, and the Study of Politics: Context,
Substance, and Methodological Challenges." Zeitschrift für Vergleichende
Politikwissenschaft, 1(1), October,
105-24.
Boeree, C. George. 1998. “"Qualitative
Methods: Part One." Shippensburg University (http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/qualmethone.html).
David, Matthew and Carole D. Sutton; 王若馨、黃郁青、夏薇婷、李怡芳譯。2007。〈質性研究法過程緒論。〉《研究方法的基礎》(台北:韋伯文化),第六章,126-38 (參考書目)。501.2
/877 (TKU)
Gerke, Solvay and
Hans-Dieter Evers. 2006.
"Globalizing Local Knowledge: Social Science Research on Southeast Asia,
1970-2000." SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues
in Southeast Asia, 21(1),
April, 1-21.
Shamsul, A.B. 2001. "Social Science in Southeast Asia Observed: A
Malaysian Viewpoint." Inter-Asia
Cultural Studies, 2(2), August, 177-98.
Sil, Rudra. 2000. "The Division of Labor in Social Science
Research: Unified Methodology or 'Organic Solidarity'?" Polity, 32(4), Summer,
499-531.
Whiting, John W.M. 1954. “The
Cross-Cultural Method.” In Lindzey Cardner, ed., Handbook
of Social Psychology (Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley), 523-31 [Also in F.W.
Moore, ed., Readings in Cross-Cultural
Methodology (New Haven: Human Relations Area Files Press, 1961), 283-91];
reprinted in Alan Sica, ed., Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume II (London: Sage
Publications, 2006), 63-77. H 61.C5245 2006
(TKU)
第七週 比較區域研究法
指定閱讀:
Teune, Henry. 1999. “Comparing
Countries: Lessons Learned.” Chap. 3 in Else Øyen,
ed., Comparative Methodology: Theory and
Practice in International Social Research (London: Sage), 38-62. HM 48.C635 1990 (TKU)
Ahram, Ariel I. 2009. "The Theory and
Method of Comparative Area Studies." Political
Methodology Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series 19, February
(http://www.concepts-methods.org/Files/WorkingPaper/PM%2019%20Ahram.pdf).
建議閱讀:
謝仙進。No date。〈比較法之研究〉。http://210.71.69.2/~tsvse/sasjkimo/sj8.doc.
任順元。No date。〈比較研究法〉。http://www.yhrtvu.com/news_view.asp?newsid=835.
Baidu. No date. 〈比較研究〉。Baidu (http://baike.baidu.com/view/1023989.htm).
Almond, Gabriel
A. 1956. “Comparative
Political Systems.” Journal of
Politics, 18, 391-409; reprinted in Alan Sica, ed., Comparative
Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume II (London: Sage Publications,
2006), 243-58. H 61.C5245 2006 (TKU)
Apter, David E. 1958. “A
Comparative Method for the Study of Politics.” American Journal of Sociology, 64(3), 221-37; reprinted in Alan Sica, ed., Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume II (London: Sage
Publications, 2006), 259-82. H 61.C5245 2006
(TKU)
Bates, Robert H.,
et al. 1998. Analytic Narratives.
Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. JC 330.2.A45 1998 (TKU)
Blau, Peter M. 1965. “The
Comparative Study of Organizations.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 18, 323-38; reprinted in Alan Sica, ed., Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume II (London: Sage
Publications, 2006), 283-302. H 61.C5245 2006
(TKU)
Johnson, Chalmers. 1997.
"Preconception vs. Observation, or the
Contributions of Rational Choice Theory and Area Studies to Contemporary
Political Science." PS:
Political Science & Politics, 30(2), June, 170-74.
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. "Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative
Research." American
Political Science Review, 99(3), August, 435-52.
Malesky, Edmund J. 2008. "Battling
Onward: The Debate Over Field Research in Developmental Economics and its
Implications for Comparative Politics." Qualitative Methods, 6(2), Fall, 17-21. (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1669745)
Ragin, Charles C. 1981. “Comparative Sociology
and the Comparative Method.” International
Journal of Comparative Sociology, 22(1-2), 102-20; reprinted in Alan Sica, ed., Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume III (London:
Sage Publications, 2006), 159-78. H 61.C5245 2006
(TKU)
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. “Case-Oriented
Comparative Methods.” Chap. 3 in The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative
Strategies (Berkeley: University of California Press), 34-52. H 61.R216 1987 (TKU)
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. “Combined
versus Synthetic Comparative Strategies.” Chap. 5 in The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative
and Quantitative Strategies (Berkeley: University of California Press),
69-84. H 61.R216 1987 (TKU)
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. “The
Variable-Oriented Approach.” Chap. 4 in The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative
Strategies (Berkeley: University of California Press), 53-68. H 61.R216 1987 (TKU)
Ragin, Charles C. 1997. "Turning the Tables:
How Case-oriented Research Challenges Variable-oriented research." Comparative
Social Research, 16, 27-42 (http://poli.haifa.ac.il/~levi/res/pitfallt.rtf).
Williams, Mark E. 2000. "Theory
Driven Comparative Analysis: Dead on the Gurney or Lost in the Shuffle?" Studies in
Comparative International Development, 35(3),
September, 112-30.
第八週 調查研究法
指定閱讀:
David, Matthew and Carole D. Sutton; 王若馨、黃郁青、夏薇婷、李怡芳譯。2007。〈調查設計〉。《研究方法的基礎》(台北:韋伯文化),第十四章,253-79 (參考書目)。501.2
/877 (TKU)
威廉斯(Malcolm
Williams)著
; 王盈智譯。2005。〈調查研究法〉。《研究方法的第一本書》(臺北縣 : 韋伯文化國際出版公司),第五章,113-35 (Bibliography)。501.2 /8365 (TKU)
建議閱讀:
Charmaz, Kathy; 顏寧, 黃詠光, 吳欣隆譯。2009。《建構扎根理論》。臺北市 : 五南圖書出版公司。(TKU)
David, Matthew and Carole D. Sutton; 王若馨、黃郁青、夏薇婷、李怡芳譯。2007。〈資料的蒐集與編碼〉。《研究方法的基礎》(台北:韋伯文化),第十五章,281-98 (參考書目)。501.2
/877 (TKU)
皮特遜 (Peterson, Robert A.); 王國川譯。2010。《如何編製優質的問卷》。臺北市 : 五南圖書出版公司。540.153 /8353 (TKU)
柯費爾 (Kvale, Steinar); 陳育含譯。2010。《訪談研究法》。臺北縣永和市 : 韋伯文化國際出版公司。501.2
/8533 (TKU)
謝德曼 (Seidman, Irving); 李政賢譯。2009。《訪談研究法》。臺北市 : 五南圖書出版公司。501.2
/8258 (TKU)
“Survey Research.” Research Methods Knowledge Bas (http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/survey.php).
第九週 歷史研究與文獻分析
指定閱讀:
King's College. 2005. "The
Historical Method and Documentary Research." http://staff.kings.edu/bapavlac/evalsources.html.
Lane, Jan-Erik. 1999. “Data
Archives as an Instrument for Comparative Research.” Chap. 11 in Else Øyen, ed., Comparative
Methodology: Theory and Practice in International Social Research (London:
Sage), 187-202. HM 48.C635 1990 (TKU)
建議閱讀:
姚毓婷、蘇家毓。2007。〈歷史研究法〉。台北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所教育研究法小組報告,12月10日(http://mail2.tmue.edu.tw/~g961209/961210.doc).
謝佳諺。2007。〈歷史研究法〉。國小獨立研究常用的方法 (http://spe.idv.tw/share/file/20070718190901_002-4%2851-64%29.pdf).
Lin, T.W. 2009. 〈03研究方法〉。http://sites.google.com/site/twlin09/themes/methods.
Franzosi, Roberto. 1998. “Narrative
as Data: Linguistic and Statistical Tools for the Quantitative Study of
Historical Events.” International
Review of Social History, 43, 81-104; reprinted in Alan
Sica, ed., Comparative
Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume IV (London: Sage Publications,
2006), 67-90. H 61.C5245 2006 (TKU)
Goldstone, Jack A. 1982. “The
Comparative and Historical Study of Revolutions.” Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 187-207; reprinted in Alan
Sica, ed., Comparative
Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume II (London: Sage Publications,
2006), 325-47. H 61.C5245 2006 (TKU)
Lieberman, Evan S. 2001. “Causal
Inference in Historical Institutional analysis: A Specification of
Periodization Strategies.” Comparative Political Studies, 34(9), 1011-35; reprinted in Alan
Sica, ed., Comparative
Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume II (London: Sage Publications,
2006), 162-85. H 61.C5245 2006 (TKU)
Palmquist, Ruth A. no date. "The Historical
Approach to Research." http://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~palmquis/courses/historical.htm.
Skocpol, Theda and Margaret Somers. 1980. “The Use of
Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.”
Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22, 174-97; reprinted in Alan
Sica, ed., Comparative
Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume III (London: Sage Publications,
2006), 198-223. H 61.C5245 2006 (TKU)
第十週 證據分析
指定閱讀:
伊殷 (Yin, Robert K.);
周海濤、李永賢、張蘅譯。2009。〈個案研究的證據分析〉。《個案研究:設計與方法》第五章,165-209。臺北市:五南圖書出版公司(References)。501.21
/889 3rd ed. (TKU)
威廉斯(Malcolm
Williams)著
; 王盈智譯。2005。〈調查資料的分析〉。《研究方法的第一本書》(臺北縣 : 韋伯文化國際出版公司),第七章,161-97。501.2
/8365 (TKU)
建議閱讀:
席爾曼 (Silverman,
David); 田哲榮, 司徒懿譯。2010。《解析質性研究法與資料》。臺北縣永和市 : 韋伯文化國際出版公司。501.2
/8438 (TKU)
葛畢奇 (Grbich, Carol); 司徒懿譯。2009。《簡明質性研究法分析》。臺北縣永和市 : 韋伯文化國際出版公司。501.2
/8665 (TKU)
Herkenrath, Mark. 2002. “Quantitative
Cross-National Analysis as a Research Tool in the Sociology of Developing
Countries: A Critical Examination.” Current
Sociology, 50(4), 517-30; reprinted in Alan
Sica, ed., Comparative
Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume IV (London: Sage Publications,
2006), 322-36. H 61.C5245 2006 (TKU)
Lieberson,
Stanley. 1991. “Small
N’s and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies
Based on a Small Number of Cases.” Social
Forces, 70(2), 307-20; reprinted in Alan
Sica, ed., Comparative
Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume IV (London: Sage Publications,
2006), 337-52. H 61.C5245 2006 (TKU)
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Strategies
of Causal Inference in Small-N
Analysis.” Sociological Methods &
Research, 28(4), 387-424; reprinted in Alan
Sica, ed., Comparative
Methods in the Social Sciences. Volume IV (London: Sage Publications,
2006), 353-85. H 61.C5245 2006 (TKU)
“Analysis.” Research Methods Knowledge Base (http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/analysis.php).
第十一週 撰寫研究計畫
指定閱讀:
龐奇 (Punch, Keith
F.); 張可婷譯。2009。〈撰寫研究計劃〉。《做出有效的研究論文與計劃》(臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司),第六章,87-109 (參考書目)。501.2
/835 (TKU)
龐奇 (Punch, Keith
F.); 張可婷譯。2009。〈策略〉。《做出有效的研究論文與計劃》(臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司),第七章,111-28 (參考書目)。501.2
/835 (TKU)
建議閱讀:
貝利(Ralph Berry)著;李美馨譯。2003。〈報告的構成〉。《最新研究論文寫作指導》(臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司),第五章,59-70。811.4
/847 (TKU)。
龐奇 (Punch, Keith F.); 張可婷譯。2009。〈研究計畫範例〉。《做出有效的研究論文與計劃》(臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司),第八章,129-94。501.2 /835 (TKU)
〈如何準備論文大綱?〉。
第十二週 寫作與發表技巧
指定閱讀:
伊殷 (Yin, Robert K.);
周海濤、李永賢、張蘅譯。2009。〈撰寫個案研究報告〉。《個案研究:設計與方法》第六章,211-47。臺北市:五南圖書出版公司(References)。501.21
/889 3rd ed. (TKU)
蔡今中。2010。〈一定要試著去投稿-寫作及投稿技巧〉。《社會科學研究與論文寫作:成功發表秘笈》,三版(臺北市:高等教育文化事業公司),Chap. 5, 73-105。501.2 /8466 99 (TKU)
建議閱讀:
王國璋。2010。《學術論文的寫作方法與論述 : 附多種參考樣本》。臺北市 : 時英出版社。811.4
/8455.2 (TKU)
孟樊。2009。《論文寫作方法與格式》。臺北縣深坑鄉 : 威仕曼文化事業公司。811.4 /847.2 (TKU)
威廉斯(Malcolm
Williams)著
; 王盈智譯。2005。〈撰寫研究發現〉。《研究方法的第一本書》(臺北縣 : 韋伯文化國際出版公司),第十章,241-62。501.2 /8365 (TKU)
張進上編著。2009。《談論文撰寫歷程》。高雄市 : 高雄復文圖書出版社。811.4 /8795 (TKU)
赫柏那 (Heppner, P.
Paul and Mary J. Heppner)原著;
王麗斐等譯。2010。《研究論文寫作 : 撰寫與投稿的武功祕笈》。臺北市 : 新加坡商聖智學習亞洲私人公司臺灣分公司。811.4 /8345 (TKU)
魯賓 (Rebecca B. Rubin), 魯賓 (Alan M. Rubin), 皮雷 (Linda J. Piele)著; 劉心陽譯。1997。〈撰寫研究報告〉。《傳播研究方法:策略與來源》(臺北市:亞太圖書出版社),第十章。541.83 /862 (TKU)
Turner, Joan. 2002. “Getting
to Grips with the Essay.” Chapter 5 in How
to Study: A Short Introduction (Thousand Oaks: SAGE), 63-79. LB 2395.T845 2002 (TKU)
UNC. “Summary: Using It Wisely.” UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/summary.html).
UNC. “Introductions.” UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/introductions.html).
UNC. “Conclusions.” UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/conclusions.html).
UNC. “Plagiarism.” UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/plagiarism.html).
UNC. “Abstracts.” UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/abstracts.html).
“Write-Up.” Research Methods Knowledge Base (http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/writeup.php).
第十三週 修正與定稿
指定閱讀:
貝利(Ralph Berry)著;李美馨譯。2003。〈定稿〉。《最新研究論文寫作指導》(臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司),第六章,63-75。811.4 /847 (TKU)
Turner, Joan. 2002. “Revision
Strategies.” In How to Study: A Short
Introduction (Thousand Oaks: SAGE), 104-7. LB
2395.T845 2002 (TKU)
建議閱讀:
貝利(Ralph Berry)著;李美馨譯。2003。〈一些應避免的錯誤〉。《最新研究論文寫作指導》(臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司),第八章,105-11。811.4
/847 (TKU)。
Turner, Joan. 2002. “Finding Your Own
Writing Voice.” In How to Study: A Short
Introduction (Thousand Oaks: SAGE), 117-27. LB
2395.T845 2002 (TKU)
UNC. "Reorganizing Drafts." UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/organization.html).
UNC. "Revising Drafts." UNC Handout (http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/revision.html).
第十四週 總結
玖、其他參考書籍:
Goertz, Gary 原著 ; 徐子婷, 梁書寧, 朱玉譯。2010。《社會科學概念:方法論的思考》。臺北縣永和市:韋伯文化國際出版公司。(TKU)
Neuman, W. Lawrence著,王佳煌、潘中道等譯。2002。《當代社會研究法:質化與量化途徑。》台北:學富文化事業。540.1 /866-1 (TKU)
布斯 (Booth, Wayne C.), [科倫布]Gregory G. Colomb, [威廉斯]Joseph M. Williams著; 陳美霞, 徐畢卿, 許甘霖譯。2009。《研究的藝術》。臺北市 : 巨流圖書公司。501.2 /855.2 (TKU)
貝克爾 (Becker, Howard
S.); 郭姿吟, 呂錦媛翻譯。2009。《這才是做研究的王道》。臺北市 : 群學出版公司。501.2
/8453 (TKU)
納邁士。2001。《社會科學研究方法。》臺北:臺灣西書出版社。501.2 /8584 6th ed. (TKU)
納邁士。2003。《最新社會科學研究方法。》臺北:韋伯文化事業出版社。501.2
/8584 5th ed. 92 (TKU)
畢恆達。2010。《教授為什麼沒告訴我 : 2010全見版》。臺北縣板橋市:小畢空間出版社。811.4 /8637.3-1 (TKU)
陳超塵編著。2009。《研究方法論》。臺北市 : 陳超塵。153
/8743 (TKU)
雷德。2002。《社會科學研究的理論與方法。》臺北:韋伯文化事業出版社。501.2 /845 (TKU)
Research Methods Knowledge Base (http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/index.htm).
拾、成績考核方式:
一、 出席及參與(25%):學生在上課前必須先仔細閱讀指定資料,並積極參與課堂之討論,曠課超過兩次將會明顯影響學期成績。
二、 提問
(25%):每位學生必須針對三個主題就指定閱讀於上課前提出相關問題,問題必須顯示對所閱讀資料有深切的了解,並與該堂課目有密切之關聯性。
三、 習題與報告(50%)